Brisc vs VIPR

Brisc vs VIPR: what was bound, what was paid.

VIPR tells you what was bound; Brisc tells you what was paid. Most customers run both.

Different layers

Two jobs, one workflow.

VIPR

Bordereaux management

VIPR Intrali ingests, validates and standardises coverholder bordereaux into compliance-ready reporting. The established bordereaux platform of the Lloyd’s and London market: the hygiene layer.

Brisc

Reconciliation to cash

The Bordereaux Analyst validates the bordereau against the binder, then reconciles it to the money at policy, layer or treaty level. Every match carries its evidence; every exception carries an explanation.

Side by side

Where each one stops.

 VIPRBrisc
The job Ingest, validate and standardise bordereaux Reconcile bordereaux and cash, evidence attached
The question it answers “Is this bordereau clean and complete?” “Did the cash arrive, and does it reconcile?”
Bank statement matching Outside its scope The core of the product
Output Validated, standardised bordereaux data and reports Matched cash posted back with the evidence trail; exceptions queued with reasons
Where it sits Upstream: data hygiene Downstream: cash truth
How matching works Not a matching product Deterministic rules; AI reads the documents and argues borderline cases, never decides a match
The decision

Which one do you need?

Choose VIPR

When the problem is bordereaux hygiene: multi-format coverholder data that needs ingesting, validating and standardising into compliance-ready reporting.

Choose Brisc

When the problem is the cash: premium reported on the bordereau that has to be matched to money in the bank, with evidence an auditor can follow. See bank reconciliation.

Run both

Most customers do. A clean, validated bordereau is a high-quality input to Brisc’s matching engine. VIPR did the hygiene; Brisc picks up where it stops.

Comparing reconciliation platforms instead? Brisc vs AutoRek →

Common questions

Brisc vs VIPR, answered

What is the difference between Brisc and VIPR?

VIPR tells you what was bound. Brisc tells you what was paid. VIPR Intrali ingests, validates and standardises bordereaux; Brisc reconciles the bordereau against the binder and the bank statement, with evidence on every match. They sit on different layers of the same workflow.

Is Brisc a replacement for VIPR?

No. VIPR solves bordereaux hygiene: getting messy multi-format coverholder data into a clean, validated state. Brisc solves the cash question that starts where hygiene ends: did the money arrive, and does it reconcile against what was reported? Most customers run both.

Does Brisc work with data that comes out of VIPR?

Yes. Brisc works from the bordereaux you already produce, and a validated, standardised bordereau is a high-quality input to the matching engine. Day one needs no integration: uploads in, evidenced CSV out.

Is Brisc’s matching AI?

The matching is deterministic, rule-based and explainable. AI reads the documents as they arrive and argues the borderline cases; it never decides a match. Every match names the rule that made it.

How accurate is Brisc, and how long until it is live?

97%+ matching accuracy at steady state. Expect 80% of records matched on day one, climbing to 92 to 95% by about 90 days as the rule base absorbs your book. Live in 2 to 6 weeks.

Bring your own bordereau. Watch it balance.

30 minutes, no slide deck. We run your real bordereau and a real bank statement. Your book is specific; the walkthrough should be too.

Book the walkthrough