Reconciliation Analyst

Premium in, claims out. A cash position you can prove.

Bank statements and remittances matched against bound policies and settled claims, with the governing rule and source document on every line. Once it balances, the capacity bordereau and per-carrier remittance reports are generated from matched cash.

  1. 1Documents arrive
  2. 2Matched, with evidence
  3. 3Exceptions go to you
  4. 4Month closed
Bank statement, Juneclient money account
DatePayer / referenceGBP
02 JunMRLD BRKNG LDN 774112,480.00
03 JunHWDN INS SVCS 44198,212.50
05 JunBATES & CO BATCH 061221,905.60
06 JunFPS ACORN UW 06314,650.00
09 JunMRLD BRKNG 7741-E1,050.00
11 JunUNKNOWN REF 882132,300.00
6 of 48 lines shown
0 of 48
bank lines matched
Ref 7741 · net of 22.5% commission
Ref 4419 · net of 25% commission
Remittance lists three policies
Ref 0631 · exact net premium
41 more lines matched the same way
June bordereaucoverholder file · net due
RowBroker · policyNet GBP
07Howden · POL-441908,212.50
18Marmalade · POL-7741212,480.00
22Bates & Co · POL-501187,300.00
23Bates & Co · POL-501219,125.60
24Bates & Co · POL-501305,480.00
31Acorn UW · POL-063174,650.00
6 of 214 rows shown

Needs you · 3

GBP 1,050.00 from Marmalade. Looks like an endorsement on POL-77412, but the commission taken is 30% and the binder says 22.5%.
bank line 9binder scheduleApproveOverride
GBP 2,300.00, ref 88213. No bordereau line and the payer is not on any binder. Held, nothing posted.
bank line 11AssignInvestigate
+ 1 more held for review: a partial payment awaiting the broker's statement.

June reconciled

45 of 48 lines matched, each with the evidence that proves it. 3 queued for review, each with a reason.

audit trail exportedcapacity bordereau ready
Proof from production

The numbers, up front.

$786M

Premium reconciled through Brisc so far, and climbing. On track for ~$1B a year at our current run rate

97%+

Output accuracy, with every match carrying its evidence

2 to 6 weeks

Typical time to go live. No PAS integration required

The jobs inside

Start from the direction of the money.

Three flows, one platform, one rule base.

The value

Reporting, accuracy, fraud. Covered in both directions.

Matching is the mechanism. What finance signs off on is the point.

A position you can prove

Premium and claims cash trace back to matched records and source documents, so month-end stops carrying guesses.

Loss surfaced after settlement

The control that assumes something got through: duplicates, misdirected settlements and receipts that never land surface as exceptions.

Evidence that survives review

Client-money reviews, year-end, capacity audits: the trail of documents, rules and approvals exports in one pass.

The output

Matched cash becomes the file you remit against.

Reconciliation is not finished when the statement balances. It is finished when the reports that depend on it are out the door.

The capacity bordereau

Generated from matched cash and validated line items once the month balances. The premium you report up to capacity, built from what actually arrived.

Per-carrier remittance reports

What arrived, what it belongs to, what is outstanding, net of each party’s commission. One report per carrier or syndicate, in the layout they already expect.

Claims settlement statements

Claims payments verified against agreements, with duplicates, reversals and failed receipts held back and evidenced.

Into your systems, not ours

Golden-schema export, or posted to your PAS, general ledger or data lake. Your systems of record stay canonical.

One engine

Match by rule. Argue the borderline. Guess nothing.

Deterministic rules and tolerances

Matching runs on rules, tolerances and confidence tiers; every match names the rule that made it.

AI reads the documents

The model reads statements and remittances and argues the borderline cases; it never decides a match.

The honest ramp

80% of records match on day one; the rate climbs to 92–95% over roughly 90 days.

Better matches start with a better bordereau.

Reconciliation is only as good as the expected side of the match. When the Bordereaux Analyst validates the file first, commission rates, duplicates and missing rows are resolved before cash is applied, and the capacity bordereau is generated from figures that have already passed binder terms. Run either on its own. Run both and the exception queue shrinks from both ends.

See the Bordereaux Analyst

One engine. Rules, tolerances and evidence shared across every Analyst.

Common questions

Insurance reconciliation, answered

Does the Analyst replace our PAS or GL?

No. Your PAS stays the system of record. The Analyst does the matching and posts one thing back: matched cash against the right premium, with the evidence trail for why. It isn’t a second ledger to keep in sync.

Is the matching based on rules or AI, and what does it learn from our corrections?

Matching runs on rules, tolerances and confidence tiers; AI reads the documents and argues the borderline cases, never the arithmetic. Your corrections become three things you can inspect: new deterministic rules, sharper prompts tuned on your data, and a permanent store of confirmed payer aliases. 80% on day one, 92 to 95% by about 90 days.

What happens to what it can’t match?

It stops and asks. Unmatched rows queue with the reasoning and source documents attached, ready for your team’s judgment. Nothing is guessed, nothing is silently corrected.

Does it produce the bordereau and remittance reports, or just the match?

Both. Once cash balances, the Analyst generates the premium bordereau you report to capacity and the per-carrier remittance reports, from matched line items with evidence attached. Exceptions are held back and listed, not silently dropped.

Bring your own bank statement. Watch it balance.

30 minutes, no slide deck. We run your data: a real statement and a real bordereau. Your business is specific; the walkthrough should be too.

Book the walkthrough