Insurers match incoming premium payments to policies through a three-way reconciliation: the bank statement, the premium bordereau, and the broker remittance. When all three agree, the payment is applied with the evidence for why.
Each record answers a different question, and none of them shares an identifier with the others.
What was written and reported: each policy bound, its premium, its period. It confirms what is owed, not what has arrived.
What actually arrived, and when. Reference codes are the broker’s own, and one credit can aggregate payments across programs.
What the broker intended to pay, net of what deductions. It arrives as a PDF, an email table, or not at all.
In most industries, reconciliation is invoice-to-payment. Insurance is structurally different, and four patterns do most of the damage.
Brokers net premium against claims adjustments, endorsements and credits. One wire can carry dozens of policy-level movements.
The bank shows the broker’s internal code, the bordereau shows the policy number, the remittance shows a third thing.
Premium reported in one period arrives in another. The bordereau and the cash are rarely in the same month.
Every broker structures remittances their own way, and the format changes without notice. Custom logic rots.
The type of gap directs the investigation:
That last gap is how unallocated cash builds. In delegated-authority operations, matching and exception-chasing already absorbs 45–60% of credit-control hours.
Manual matching runs on pattern recognition in analysts’ heads, and that knowledge leaves when they do. For UK MGAs there is a regulatory edge too: premium held in trust falls under FCA client money rules (CASS), so unreconciled cash in a trust account is a compliance question, not just an efficiency one.
Brisc’s Reconciliation Analyst runs the three-way match with a ladder of deterministic, explainable rules. AI reads the documents and argues the borderline cases; it never decides a match. Every matched row records the rule that made it.
Verified matching accuracy in production, with every match traceable to its rule and its source documents.
Match rate on day one, climbing over roughly 90 days as rules and aliases accumulate.
Roughly the share of rows that need human review at steady state. The rest clears itself.
See the full matching ladder on bank reconciliation for insurance or the rule ladder, in detail, read the three-way match guide, or browse all guides.
Through a three-way reconciliation of the bank statement, the premium bordereau, and the broker remittance. Each bank credit is traced to the policies, programs and periods it settles. Because payments are netted across policies and the three records rarely share an identifier, the matching needs logic built for insurance cash flow, not invoice-to-payment logic.
It is the process of confirming that cash received in the bank matches the premium reported in bordereaux and broker remittances. The three records are compared; when they agree, the payment is applied and evidenced. When they disagree, the specific gap directs the investigation. The output is a verified cash position, not just a matched dataset.
Three data sources, produced on different schedules, using different identifiers, in different formats. Brokers net premiums against adjustments before remitting, so one bank credit can represent dozens of policy-level movements across programs. General-purpose reconciliation tools built for one-payment-one-invoice data cannot decompose that without constant custom work.
Money that has arrived in the bank but hasn’t been attributed to a policy, program or period. It accumulates when matching capacity falls behind payment volume, and it sits in suspense misstating the debtor position. The funds aren’t missing; the attribution hasn’t kept pace.
Delegated authority credit control is the London-market term for reconciling written premium against received cash within DA programs: chasing outstanding broker balances, resolving timing mismatches, and keeping a current view of what coverholders owe. Bank-to-bordereaux matching is the technical process at its core.
General-purpose tools match transactions with consistent identifiers across structured data. Insurance premium matching needs the opposite: decomposing netted multi-policy payments, absorbing timing gaps between reporting and receipt, and reading remittance formats that vary by broker. Insurance-native matching is built around bordereau structure and broker behaviour.
30 minutes, no slide deck, your real files: a bordereau, a statement, a submission. Your business is specific; the walkthrough should be too.
Book the walkthrough