A mutual’s cash is a structure problem, not a volume problem. One installment can carry standard premium, optional pool elections and five open loss years, and the remittance rarely says which. Brisc decomposes each receipt against the invoice schedule and ties out the dividend run, evidence attached in both directions.
| Loss year | Item | Invoiced |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Standard premium | 1,120,400.00 |
| 2025 | Standard premium | 986,220.00 |
| 2024 | Standard premium | 712,860.00 |
| 2023 | Standard premium | 402,110.00 |
| 2022 | Standard premium | 169,650.00 |
| 2026 | Optional pool election | 1,204,766.00 |
| 2026 | Windstorm excess | 216,500.00 |
| Account | Loss year | Allocated |
|---|---|---|
| Standard premium | 2026 | 1,120,400.00 |
| Standard premium | 2025 | 986,220.00 |
| Standard premium | 2024 | 712,860.00 |
| Standard premium | 2023 | 402,110.00 |
| Standard premium | 2022 | 169,650.00 |
| Optional pool | 2026 | 1,204,766.00 |
| Windstorm excess | 2026 | 216,500.00 |
Member 41’s wire split across five loss years, the optional pool and windstorm excess, balanced to the cent. The dividend run ties to applied premium, with evidence in both directions.
The engine that split this wire also ties out the dividend run and reads member claims. One record answers the auditor’s question: which member, which loss year, which dollar.
A member-owned mutual collects formula-driven premium in installments, runs a dividend when capital allows, and pays claims out over years. Call it thirty cash events a month. The count is small; the consequences are not: the payer is not always the member, aging is a covenant because unpaid premium can end coverage, and every allocation feeds loss-year funding math that must reconcile at year end in front of your auditor. A small finance team runs all of this today, in spreadsheets that live in one person’s head.
One leads: the Reconciliation Analyst, running member cash application. Two more apply as the group’s book demands.
Each receipt allocated to member, pool, loss year and installment against the invoice schedule; broker-routed payments matched back to the member account; every position aged against its due date. Deterministic rules make the match, evidence on every line.
Bank reconciliation →Loss notifications and claims schedules arrive in whatever format the market sends. The Analyst reads them in full, flags material movements by your criteria, and keeps a defensible record of what arrived when.
Claims management →Where a group company writes specialty business or works with delegated partners, its bordereaux get the same treatment: normalised per contract, validated, reconciled to cash.
Bordereaux reconciliation →Different seat? See MGAs, carriers and insurers or reinsurers.
Because every receipt is decomposed and evidenced, the member ledger stops being a spreadsheet and becomes a foundation:
Reporting is scoped to your conventions during onboarding; the discipline underneath it is the product.
The case for Brisc at a mutual is not headcount; thirty events a month never was. It is allocation accuracy where an error compounds through years of loss-year funding, deadline certainty on the covenants that decide coverage and distributions, auditability your member-owners can stand on, and institutional memory that stays in the platform when people move on.
For a mutual the case was never volume. One member wire can carry several pools, optional elections and five open loss years at once, and the remittance rarely says which. The Analyst decomposes each receipt against the invoice schedule, ages every position against its due date, and keeps the evidence attached. You are not buying keystrokes back; you are buying allocation accuracy, deadline certainty and an audit trail your members’ auditors can follow.
Yes. The invoice schedule is treated as ground truth, and each receipt is allocated to member, pool, loss year and installment, with the rule that made each allocation named on the line. Where a wire does not balance against the schedule, it is flagged as an exception rather than forced.
No. Broker-routed payments, including those net of commission, are matched back to the member account they settle. The payer and the member are treated as separate facts, and both appear in the evidence.
Both directions get the same discipline. A declared dividend run is tied out member by member against its deadline, and claims disbursements on multi-year schedules are reconciled back to the loss years they fund.
No. Your ledger stays the system of record. The Analyst matches, allocates, evidences and posts; your team keeps the judgment calls, with the borderline cases argued in front of them instead of buried in a spreadsheet.
30 minutes, no slide deck. Watch the Analyst decompose a member installment into pools, loss years and installments against your invoice schedule, and age it against the due date.
Book the walkthrough