Brisc vs Diesta

Brisc vs Diesta: reconciliation with the payments, or reconciliation on its own.

Diesta and Brisc both match insurance premium cash to what was owed. Diesta wraps that in a payments platform with its own insurance ledger and payment initiation. Brisc does the matching and the document reading only, and posts results back to the systems you already run. Choose on whether you want the money movement in the same product.

Two shapes

A payments platform, and an Analyst that reads your documents.

Diesta

Reconciliation, an insurance ledger and payments in one platform

Diesta calls itself “a dedicated payments platform for the unique flows within the insurance industry”. Its platform has Reconciliation, a specialised financial ledger for insurance money, Payments with “integrated credit control and payment initiation”, and Diesta AI. It sells to MGAs, brokers and insurers, and is built in London.

Brisc

A Reconciliation Analyst that reads your documents

Built only for insurance. The Reconciliation Analyst reads bank statements, broker and cedant statements, remittance advices and bordereaux in the layout each party sends, matches cash to policies, binders and claims with deterministic rules, and attaches the evidence to every match. It does not move money and it is not a ledger.

Side by side

Overlap on matching. Different everywhere else.

 DiestaBrisc
Scope Reconciliation, an insurance ledger, payments and credit control Reconciliation and the document reading that feeds it
Moves money Yes. Payment initiation and embedded payouts are part of the platform No. Brisc never holds or moves funds
Ledger Its own insurance ledger module None. Results post back to your policy system, general ledger or data lake
What it reads Premium records, bank data, payment-provider transactions and partner documents in “PDF, Excel, or custom layouts” Bank statements, broker and cedant statements, remittance advices, bordereaux and Lloyd’s market formats
How matching works Describes its matching and its format recognition as driven by AI Deterministic rules; AI reads the documents and argues borderline cases, never decides a match
Trust accounts Three-way reconciliation through virtual accounts linked to trust accounts Matches against the bank accounts you already have
Bordereaux Not mentioned on its platform pages Read, validated and reconciled to cash by the Bordereaux Analyst
Security States SOC 2, ISO 27001 and GDPR compliance SOC 2 Type II; one dedicated tenant per customer on Azure; your data never trains a model
Time to live Not stated 2 to 6 weeks; day one needs no policy-system integration
The decision

Which one do you need?

Choose Diesta

When you want collection, allocation and payout in one product, when you are ready to route premium through virtual accounts, or when a purpose-built insurance ledger would replace spreadsheets you rely on today.

Choose Brisc

When the hard part is the paperwork: remittance advices that arrive as PDFs and email tables, one payment covering forty policies net of commission, bordereaux that have to tie to the bank. And when you want that solved without changing how money moves or adopting another ledger to keep in step.

Run both

They overlap on matching and differ everywhere else. A team could collect and pay through Diesta and still use Brisc to read partner bordereaux and prove reported premium against cash.

Comparing a controls platform instead? Brisc vs AutoRek →

Common questions

Brisc vs Diesta, answered

Is Diesta or Brisc better for an MGA with unallocated cash?

If cash is unallocated because remittance detail arrives late or unreadable, Brisc is built for that reading problem. If it is unallocated because payments arrive through channels you cannot see into, Diesta’s virtual accounts address the cause. Find out which it is before buying either.

Does Brisc replace our ledger or accounting system?

No. Brisc matches and explains, then posts the result to the system that holds the record. Diesta offers a ledger of its own; Brisc deliberately does not.

Does either use AI to decide matches?

Diesta says its matching is driven by AI. In Brisc, matching rules are deterministic and every match names the rule that made it. AI reads documents and proposes how to handle borderline cases, and a person approves those.

What does Brisc not do?

It does not initiate payments, hold client money, or produce regulatory client-money reports. It does not split a single payment that arrives with no remittance advice: that goes to an exception queue for a person.

Bring your own bank statement. Watch it balance.

30 minutes, no slide deck. Tell us where the volume hurts and we show you the Analyst on it. Bring a bordereau, statement or submission if you have one; you don’t need to.

Book the walkthrough

Not ready for a call? Get the Decoding AI guide →